First Amendment
Publishing observations of public airspace activity is protected speech and protected press activity. We are journalists with sensors.
ADS-B is an unencrypted public broadcast required by FAA regulation. Recording, analyzing, and publishing aircraft activity is constitutionally protected speech. Here is the framework that makes our findings hold up.
Publishing observations of public airspace activity is protected speech and protected press activity. We are journalists with sensors.
Minimum safe altitudes over congested areas, residential, and uncongested zones. We document deviations against the published baseline.
Civil rights remedy where state actors — including agencies operating or contracting aircraft — violate constitutional rights under color of law.
Aircraft owned or operated by public agencies are subject to disclosure. We provide templates and tracking.
Our SHA-256 + Merkle chain satisfies authentication of digital records. Hashes are reproducible and tamper-evident.
Statistical anomaly detection with published baselines, peer-reviewable code, and known error rates clears the standard for expert evidence.
We are not flight-tracking hobbyists. We document the systematic erosion of the right to be free from unreasonable search and seizure — by aerial proxy.
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated...
Your backyard is not public airspace. Your bedroom window is not a surveillance target. Patterned low-altitude overflights that enable visual, thermal, or electronic intrusion are not 'plain view' — they are unreasonable search by aerial proxy. See Kyllo v. United States (2001) and Carpenter v. United States (2018).
Congress shall make no law... abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press...
Recording public ADS-B broadcasts, analyzing public FAA records, and publishing findings is protected speech and press activity. The government cannot retaliate against citizens for documenting government conduct.
No person shall... be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law...
If surveillance is used to construct investigations, create pretextual stops, or build dossiers without warrant or judicial oversight, due process is violated at the collection stage. We document the collection.
In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right... to be confronted with the witnesses against him...
If aircraft-collected evidence reaches a courtroom, the defense has the right to examine chain of custody, calibration records, operator identity, and mission authorization. Our SHA-256 + Merkle chain provides that forensic foundation.
No State shall... deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
If surveillance resources are disproportionately deployed against specific neighborhoods, ethnic communities, or political dissidents, equal protection is violated. Population-scale documentation reveals those disparities.
| Violation pattern | Constitutional basis | Remedy |
|---|---|---|
| Repeated low-altitude overflights capturing private activity | 4th Amendment | Bivens action / § 1983 claim |
| Retaliation for documenting aircraft activity | 1st Amendment | § 1983 + injunctive relief |
| Warrantless aerial-surveillance evidence used in proceedings | 4th + 6th Amendment | Suppression motion + civil claim |
| Surveillance targeting protected class or political viewpoint | 14th Amendment | Equal protection litigation + DOJ complaint |
| Pattern of surveillance without judicial oversight | 4th + 5th Amendment | Declaratory judgment + injunctive relief |
Not legal advice. Patterns above are documented in our Findings and Violations logs and exportable with full SHA-256 chain of custody. Bring the receipts to your attorney.
We do not provide legal advice. We provide evidence — clean, hashed, and exportable — to the attorney of your choice. We can refer you to civil rights practices that take qualifying cases on contingency.
Request a referral →